<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TDD Tips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.larsvonkconsultancy.nl/2009/07/tdd-tips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.larsvonkconsultancy.nl/2009/07/tdd-tips/</link>
	<description>Blogs about Software Development, Agility and all the Rest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:14:32 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FitNesse Scenario are the Bomb &#171; Vonk&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.larsvonkconsultancy.nl/2009/07/tdd-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>FitNesse Scenario are the Bomb &#171; Vonk&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.larsvonkconsultancy.nl/?p=75#comment-116</guid>
		<description>[...] TDD Tips &#187;  In a previous blog on TDD I advocated that you should define your test on a high level. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TDD Tips &raquo;  In a previous blog on TDD I advocated that you should define your test on a high level. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lonneke Dikmans</title>
		<link>http://blog.larsvonkconsultancy.nl/2009/07/tdd-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Lonneke Dikmans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.larsvonkconsultancy.nl/?p=75#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with the first three statements. I have the same experience. The last one, however, is a self fulfilling prophecy: &quot;Secondly in 99% of the applications the database is only a datastorage&quot;, is going to be true if you keep the database out as long as possible. Because you do the design in your refactoring.
I think you should not keep any aspect out, and keep your options open: you can use a GPL like Java, or DSL like Drools or a PL/SQL. Also configuration and storage should be part of it. The requirements and experience of your developers and administrators determine the best solution, not &lt;strong&gt;just&lt;/strong&gt; the developers.
TDD is not the same as Java programming, or is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with the first three statements. I have the same experience. The last one, however, is a self fulfilling prophecy: &#8220;Secondly in 99% of the applications the database is only a datastorage&#8221;, is going to be true if you keep the database out as long as possible. Because you do the design in your refactoring.<br />
I think you should not keep any aspect out, and keep your options open: you can use a GPL like Java, or DSL like Drools or a PL/SQL. Also configuration and storage should be part of it. The requirements and experience of your developers and administrators determine the best solution, not <strong>just</strong> the developers.<br />
TDD is not the same as Java programming, or is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
